Is philosophy progressive?
Identifieur interne : 001172 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001171; suivant : 001173Is philosophy progressive?
Auteurs : John Woods [Canada]Source :
- Argumentation [ 0920-427X ] ; 1988-05-01.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Teeft :
- Agonic, Albert hofstadter, Anthony quinton, Aporetic, Aporetic character, Aporetic cluster, Aporetic clusters, Aporetic clusters account, Best opinion, Causal determination, Cognitive normativeness, Evidentiary problem, Fluid mechanics, Foundational problem, Free acts, George grant, Humanities, John woods, Legitimate subjectivity, Mathematical sciences, Methodological efficiencies, Modern quantification theory, Musical advances, Nicholas rescher, Nobel dreams, Ontological argument, Original text, Original texts, Original work, Philosophical argument, Philosophical argumentation, Philosophical efforts, Philosophical practice, Philosophy andargument, Poetical, Poetical continuities, Present purposes, Rescher, Scientific research, Semantic solipsism, Semantical solipsism, Solipsism, Spacious possibilities, Subjectivity, Tatsachen bestimmt, Technical virtuosity, University curriculum, Vitiating error.
Abstract
Abstract: Any adequate attempt to discuss progressivity in philosophy should provide some explanation of why philosophy persistently honours “the old and the false” and deals with original texts in a way in which science does not. An attempt is made to answer this question by appealing to: (1) the aporetic character of philosophy; (2) the semantical solipsism of philosophy; (3) the subjectivity of philosophy, and; (4) poetical continuities in philosophy.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00178019
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001B65
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001B64
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001099
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001187
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001172
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Is philosophy progressive?</title><author><name sortKey="Woods, John" sort="Woods, John" uniqKey="Woods J" first="John" last="Woods">John Woods</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:31F693F3951C1A8143D1DE766E52DA8099DBEF4C</idno><date when="1988" year="1988">1988</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00178019</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/31F693F3951C1A8143D1DE766E52DA8099DBEF4C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B65</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B65</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001B64</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001099</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001099</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0920-427X:1988:Woods J:is:philosophy:progressive</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001187</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001172</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001172</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Is philosophy progressive?</title><author><name sortKey="Woods, John" sort="Woods, John" uniqKey="Woods J" first="John" last="Woods">John Woods</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Philosophy, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, TKK 3M4, Lethbridge, Alberta</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Alberta</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Argumentation</title><title level="j" type="sub">An International Journal on Reasoning</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Argumentation</title><idno type="ISSN">0920-427X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1572-8374</idno><imprint><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Dordrecht</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1988-05-01">1988-05-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="157">157</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="174">174</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0920-427X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0920-427X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>aporetic cluster</term><term>cost-benefit analysis</term><term>poetry</term><term>progressivity</term><term>semantical solipsism</term><term>subjectivity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Agonic</term><term>Albert hofstadter</term><term>Anthony quinton</term><term>Aporetic</term><term>Aporetic character</term><term>Aporetic cluster</term><term>Aporetic clusters</term><term>Aporetic clusters account</term><term>Best opinion</term><term>Causal determination</term><term>Cognitive normativeness</term><term>Evidentiary problem</term><term>Fluid mechanics</term><term>Foundational problem</term><term>Free acts</term><term>George grant</term><term>Humanities</term><term>John woods</term><term>Legitimate subjectivity</term><term>Mathematical sciences</term><term>Methodological efficiencies</term><term>Modern quantification theory</term><term>Musical advances</term><term>Nicholas rescher</term><term>Nobel dreams</term><term>Ontological argument</term><term>Original text</term><term>Original texts</term><term>Original work</term><term>Philosophical argument</term><term>Philosophical argumentation</term><term>Philosophical efforts</term><term>Philosophical practice</term><term>Philosophy andargument</term><term>Poetical</term><term>Poetical continuities</term><term>Present purposes</term><term>Rescher</term><term>Scientific research</term><term>Semantic solipsism</term><term>Semantical solipsism</term><term>Solipsism</term><term>Spacious possibilities</term><term>Subjectivity</term><term>Tatsachen bestimmt</term><term>Technical virtuosity</term><term>University curriculum</term><term>Vitiating error</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Any adequate attempt to discuss progressivity in philosophy should provide some explanation of why philosophy persistently honours “the old and the false” and deals with original texts in a way in which science does not. An attempt is made to answer this question by appealing to: (1) the aporetic character of philosophy; (2) the semantical solipsism of philosophy; (3) the subjectivity of philosophy, and; (4) poetical continuities in philosophy.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Woods, John" sort="Woods, John" uniqKey="Woods J" first="John" last="Woods">John Woods</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/DebussyV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001172 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001172 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Musique
|area= DebussyV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:31F693F3951C1A8143D1DE766E52DA8099DBEF4C
|texte= Is philosophy progressive?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |